Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Topical Vs Oral Treatments in Managing Acne Vulgaris, Review of Therapeutic Outcomes and Patient Responses

Authors

  • Pratap Pokhrel S. B. Daniyarov South Branch of Kyrgyz State Medical Institute for Postgraduate and Continuous Studies, Osh, Kyrgyzstan Author
  • Azhikulova Venera Satarovna Satarovna S. B. Daniyarov South Branch of Kyrgyz State Medical Institute for Postgraduate and Continuous Studies, Osh, Kyrgyzstan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63666/ejsmr.1694-9013.3.I.2025.66

Keywords:

Acne vulgaris, topical therapy, systemic therapy, doxycycline, quality of life

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with significant physical, psychological, and quality-of-life impairment. Although topical and systemic therapies are widely used for moderate-to-severe acne, comparative evidence evaluating their efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life remains limited.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy, safety profile, and quality-of-life outcomes of topical therapy versus systemic therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted among 360 patients aged 16–40 years with moderate or severe acne vulgaris. Participants were randomized into three groups: topical therapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), lesion count reduction, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Acne-QoL scores over 24 weeks.

Results: All treatment groups showed significant clinical improvement. Systemic and combination therapies resulted in significantly greater reductions in inflammatory and total lesion counts compared with topical therapy alone (p<0.001). Combination therapy achieved the highest IGA success rate (78.3%). Quality-of-life scores improved significantly across all groups and correlated positively with clinical improvement. Topical therapy demonstrated superior tolerability.

Conclusion: Systemic therapy provides greater short-term efficacy in moderate-to-severe acne, while topical therapy offers a safer alternative. Combination therapy yields optimal clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. Individualized treatment selection is essential.

Author Biographies

  • Pratap Pokhrel, S. B. Daniyarov South Branch of Kyrgyz State Medical Institute for Postgraduate and Continuous Studies, Osh, Kyrgyzstan

    Resident Dermatology

  • Azhikulova Venera Satarovna Satarovna, S. B. Daniyarov South Branch of Kyrgyz State Medical Institute for Postgraduate and Continuous Studies, Osh, Kyrgyzstan

    HOD Department of Dermatology

References

1. Lynn DD, Umari T, Dunnick CA, Dellavalle RP. The epidemiology of acne vulgaris in late adolescence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:13-25.

2. Tan JK, Bhate K. A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172 Suppl 1:3-12.

3. Collier CN, Harper JC, Cafardi JA, Cantrell WC, Wang W, Foster KW, et al. The prevalence of acne in adults 20 years and older. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):56-9.

4. Williams HC, Dellavalle RP, Garner S. Acne vulgaris. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):361-72.

5. Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(4):303-8.

6. Halvorsen JA, Stern RS, Dalgard F, Thoresen M, Bjertness E, Lien L. Suicidal ideation, mental health problems, and social impairment are increased in adolescents with acne: a population-based study. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(2):363-70.

7. Magin P, Adams J, Heading G, Pond D, Smith W. The psychological sequelae of acne vulgaris: results of a qualitative study. Can Fam Physician. 2006;52(8):978-9.

8. Mallon E, Newton JN, Klassen A, Stewart-Brown SL, Ryan TJ, Finlay AY. The quality of life in acne: a comparison with general medical conditions using generic questionnaires. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(4):672-6.

9. Fife D. Practical evaluation and management of atrophic acne scars: tips for the general dermatologist. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4(8):50-7.

10. Bhate K, Williams HC. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(3):474-85.

11. Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, Alikhan A, Baldwin HE, Berson DS, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5):945-973.e33.

12. Nast A, Dréno B, Bettoli V, Bukvic Mokos Z, Degitz K, Dressler C, et al. European evidence-based (S3) guideline for the treatment of acne - update 2016 - short version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(8):1261-8.

13. Degitz K, Ochsendorf F. Pharmacotherapy of acne. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18(9):825-837.

14. Layton AM, Dreno B, Gollnick HP, Zouboulis CC. A review of the European Directive for prescribing systemic isotretinoin for acne vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(7):773-6.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Topical Vs Oral Treatments in Managing Acne Vulgaris, Review of Therapeutic Outcomes and Patient Responses. (2025). Eurasian Journal of Scientific and Multidisciplinary Research, 3(I), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.63666/ejsmr.1694-9013.3.I.2025.66